Just thinking, you know, as you do, about the rulings concerned with the Sāmi‘ and the Mustami‘ i.e. the “casual listener” and the “present listener who is listening with intent”.

If that’s still confusing then let me give its most common use in fiqh: in the books under the chapter for sujūd’l-tilāwah (those prostrations performed for the recital of (15) certain verses of the Qur’ān), it is said in the Hanbali madhab that the one who is sitting with the reciter and listening intently, following every word in the ayah etc, should also prostrate with the reciter as he is a Mustami‘. As for the guy passing by, who hears the verse but had no intention to stop and listen, then there is nothing upon him because he is just a Sāmi‘.

So anyway: my question is that the mass majority of scholars hold it impermissible for a person walking in a market in which there is music playing to sit down to listen properly and enjoy it and chill out as it were. Likewise, they hold it to be okay for a person to walk through said situation and continue on, despite the fact they have heard what they just did.

But what about the one who walks up, carries on walking but starts kinda’ mouthing the tune, with his heart bopping to the bass of the good ole’ days (is that a little smile I see on his lips?) but (of course) he carries on walking.

Just thinking, you know, as you do… ;-)