He is Ahmed b. Abdillāh Abu Nu‘aym al-Hāfidh al-Asbahāni al-Shāfi‘ī.
Ibn Khallikān said: Asfahāni with the bā replaced with fā is also correct.
He was Persian, born 336h in what is modern-day Iran, son of an ‘Ālim and a Muhaddith, ‘Abdullāh b. Ahmed. He studied under the many scholars present in Persia at that time and then travelled to Makkah, Basrah, Kūfah and Naysabūr. He took from Abu ‘Ali al-Sawwāf and Abu Bakr ibn al-Haytham al-Anbāri in Baghdād, Abu Bakr al-Ājūri in Makkah as well as Fārūq b. ‘Abd’l-Karīm al-Khattābi in Basrah.
His main teachers include the great Imām and Muhaddith Abu al-Qāsim al-Tabarāni, from whom he took many Hadīth, and also Abu Ahmed al-‘Assāl, the Hāfidh and Qādhi of Asbahān. Abu Nu‘aym also studied under the leader of the Muhaddithīn, Shaykh’l-Islām and author of the magnificent “‘Ilal”, Imām al-Dāraqutni, may Allāh have mercy upon them all.
He also had many students, some travelling great distances to take Hadīth from him. The greatest of these students was undoubtedly the Muhaddith of the East, Abu Bakr al-Khatīb al-Baghdādi.
The scholars have agreed on his excellence and status as an Imām, a Faqīh and his status as a Muhaddith. He was also an expert in the Qirā‘āt as mentioned by Ibn al-Jawzi. He is also considered as one of Islam’s foremost Historians, with the “Hilyah” and “Tārīkh Asbahān”.
Al-Khatīb al-Baghdādi said, “I only saw two people that deserved the title Hāfidh: Abu Nu‘aym al-Asbahāni and Abu Hāzim al-‘Abduwi al-A‘raj.”
Al-Subki said about him, “al-Imām al-Jalīl, al-Hāfidh al-Sūfi, the one who combined between fiqh and tasawwuf, the pinnacle of preservation and accuracy…”
Hamza ibn al-‘Abbās al-‘Alawi said, “The people of Hadīth said, “Abu Nu‘aym was unrivalled in Hadīth for 14 years; none could be found in the East or West who had more preserved than him and with a better chain…””
Al-Dhahabi referred to him as Shaykh’l-Islām in “Siyar” and also said, “al-Hāfidh al-Kabīr, the Muhaddith of his time…”
Ibn ‘Asākir said, “The Shaykh, Imām, al-Hāfidh, the best in his time with respect to his excellence, his collections and his knowledge; he authored famous pieces of work, was known to all and many benefitted from his books due to their quality.”
Ibn Kathīr said, “al-Hāfidh al-Kabīr, author of many, famous beneficial works, from them “Hilyat’l-Awliyā’” in a large number of volumes, indicating his great knowledge of narrations and high number of scholars he took from…”
He was criticised by some scholars for the many weak and even fabricated Hadīth that Abu Nu‘aym narrated such as by Ibn Taymiyyah, yet he still said about Abu Nu‘aym, “Hāfidh, Thiqah, Narrator of many Hadīth, broad in his knowledge of narrations…”
Ibn Taymiyyah also said, “He is from the greatest of the memorisers of Hadīth, of the most prolific authors, with the people benefitting from his works; it is not enough to say that he was just thiqah, for he was a level above that…”
Abu Nu‘aym was involved in the normal controversies of his time due to his Ash‘ari leanings, harshly criticised by some of the Hanbali scholars of his time such ibn Mandah and later ibn al-Jawzi (to which he also responded in a harsh way), but he was still respected for his status and as al-Dhahabi mentioned, such criticisms of contemporaries for one another due to differences in creed are not normally used against a scholar. Indeed al-Dhahabi in conclusion praised Abu Nu‘aym describing him as one of the Imams yet said that he spoke against Ibn Mandah “according to his desires” and that he “narrated fabricated Hadīth without indicating such.”
Also, Imām al-Dhahabi (in al-‘Uluw, 1305), Ibn Taymiyyah (in al-Majmū‘, 60/5) and Ibn al-Qayyim (in Ijtimā‘ al-Juyūsh’l-Islāmiyyah, 279) went to great lengths defending Abu Nu‘aym and his ‘aqīdah against some of the more critical Hanbali scholars of his time (such as ibn al-Jawzi), affirming for him the ‘aqīdah of Ahl’l-Sunnah.
Abu Nu‘aym wrote over 50 books, the most famous and beneficial of them the collection of sayings and narrations of many of the early Muslims in his book “Hilyat’l-Awliyā’ wa Tabaqāt’l-Asfiyā’”, starting off with the ten promised Paradise, then the Ahl’l-Sufah, then the Ascetics of the Companions, then the Tābi‘īn and their followers and then some of the Imāms, Scholars, Sūfis and Awliyā’ after them, in no particular order of name, age, place of birth or excellence, as is usually the case in other historical works.
Ibn Taymiyyah said, “His book the Hilyah is from the best works of the later historians with its narrations of the ascetics…”
He passed away at the age of 94 in the year 430h, rahimullāh.
Sources: Siyar, Tabaqāt’l-Shāfi‘iyyah 18/4, Tadhkirat’l-Huffādh 1092, al-Ahādīth al-Mu‘allah fi Kitāb’l-Hilyah 4/1
December 10, 2007 at 5:19 pm
HJC – ‘Eed al-Adhaa on Wednesday 19 December 2007
Official Decision and Announcement of the High Judiciary Council of Saudi Arabia…
Just a short time ago, Fatwa-Online was informed of the official decision and announcement of the High Judiciary Council (HJC) of Saudi Arabia that since the moon of Dhul-Hijjah was sighted this evening here in Saudi Arabia, we shall be completing twenty nine (29) days of Dhul-Qi’dah, inshaa.-Allaah.
Subsequently, 1 Dhul-Hijjah 1428 will be tomorrow, Monday 9 December 2007, and the Muslims performing Hajj will be in ‘Arafah on Tuesday 18 December 2007 (9 Dhul-Hijjah 1428), and the Muslim Ummah shall be celebrating ‘Eed al-Adhaa on Wednesday 19 December 2007, (10 Dhul-Hijjah 1428), inshaa.-Allaah.
December 10, 2007 at 7:38 pm
[Correction...]
1 Dhul-Hijjah 1428 will be tomorrow, Monday 10* December 2007, and the Muslims performing Hajj will be in ‘Arafah on Tuesday 18 December 2007 (9 Dhul-Hijjah 1428), and the Muslim Ummah shall be celebrating ‘Eed al-Adhaa on Wednesday 19 December 2007, (10 Dhul-Hijjah 1428), inshaa.-Allaah.
December 10, 2007 at 8:26 pm
If the moon was sighted evening of 9th dec (hence 10th being the 1st dhull hijja) why did it take 24 hours to decide to let us know and hence we missed out on a day’s fast etc. Was avidly checking all sources yesterday late night and no one declared it until today after maghrib.
December 11, 2007 at 4:23 am
BarakAllahu Feek!
Wa Salamu Alaikum Wa Rahmatullahi Wa Barakatu
December 11, 2007 at 7:25 am
Boxing day?
Celebrating Your Country’s National Day by Sheikh `Abd Allah b. Bayyih
Every country has its National Day. This day is not a religious festival. The new holidays that we as Muslims are prohibited from introducing into our lives are new religious holidays. We are not prohibited from other occasions where people get together for one reason or another. People celebrate their marriages, they celebrate the birth of a new child. They might celebrate any number of other occasions, and there is nothing wrong with this, as long as their celebration is not a religious observance.
It is essential to clear up the misunderstanding that many people have about this issue. Due to this misunderstanding, people have been placed in great difficulties, since so many religious people have been made to think that by observing these non-religious holidays they are committing some sort of sin.
Observing these days is not sinful. In Islamic Law, the default ruling for an activity – barring any evidence to the contrary – is that of permissibility.
We should consider how scholars related to such events in the past. There was a tradition that hailed to before the time of Islam known as `Atîrah. It was a day in the month of Rajab where an animal would customarily be slaughtered. Scholars of the Hanbalî school of law regarded it as permissible. Mâlikî scholars disliked it, since it was a practice from the times of ignorance before Islam.
Nevertheless, Hanbalî scholars saw no problem with it. They argued that there is no text forbidding it. The fact that people from since bygone days had a day in Raja where they would traditionally slaughter an animal – called a rajabi or an `atîrah – is something that is permissible by default. If people want to get together on a day in the month or Rajab or Sha`bân or any other time that of the year that suits their customs to slaughter an animal and have a feast, then that is up to them.
The same can be said for the anniversary of a country’s independence – which is usually what is meant by the “national day” in the countries of Africa and Asia that used to be colonial possessions. There is nothing in Islam to prohibit this.
We need to properly understand the hadîth where the Prophet (peace be upon him), upon his arrival in Madinah, found that the people there had two festive days wherein they would play and enjoy themselves and said: “Allah – most blessed and exalted – has replaced them with what is better: `Îd al-Fitr and `Îd al-Adhâ.” [Sunan Abî Dâwûd (1134) and Sunan al-Nasâ’î (1556)]
These were pagan religious holidays tied in with their idols. The Prophet (peace be upon him), therefore, mentioned to them the two religious holidays of the Muslims, `Îd al-Fitr and `Îd al-Adhâ. This does not imply in any way that people are forbidden to engage in any public assembly or celebration whatsoever.
As long as participating in these celebrations does not entail any sinful conduct, people should be allowed to celebrate. It is unwise to raise objections, disturb people in their traditions, and cause division in society when there is no text form the Qur’ân and Sunnah to forbid those traditions, nor any scholarly consensus even within the schools of thought.
Islamic Law is easy with regard to matters wherein there is no clear objection and where the disapproval that is expressed is not based upon any unequivocal evidence. People should be allowed the scope to express their customs. The principle of maintaining ease and facilitation is an essential principle of Islamic Law.
Allah says: “He has not placed any difficulty upon you in religion.” [Sûrah al-Hajj: 78]
He says: “Allah desires that He should make light your burdens.” [Sûrah al-Nisâ': 28]
Anas relates that the Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “Make things easy and do not make things difficult. Give glad tidings and do not become divided.” [Sahîh al-Bukhârî (69) and Sahîh Muslim (1734)]
We say again that the religion of Islam, essentially, seeks to make things easy for the people. The other opinions and views that scholars have on this matter should be treated with respect. Nevertheless, those opinions are not sacred scripture.
And Allah knows best.
Sheikh `Abd Allah b. Bayyih (Islamtoday)