“Don’t call it a comeback… “ said the Cool J Afridi. “I’ve been here for years.”
Indeed. Afridi has been around for AGES; it really does feel like 20 years as Sir Beefy mentioned! And knowing how NADRA operates back home, he probably is in his early forties too!
Well done Pakistan today and well done Afridi for another great performance (and about time!) in winning the T20 World Cup today.

Well done also to Younis Khan for having the guts to slap it in short and really surprise the truly outstanding Dilshan and other Sri Lankan batsmen. Well done to everyone’s favourite cricketeer Sangakkara for a wonderful effort to give his boys a fighting total – and you know that every Pak fan had butterflies in their stomachs all the way during the run chase until Afridi battered Udana for six. Truth be told, I thought Sri Lanka had taken the game once Mathews started slogging Umar Gul and the boys around at the end and getting a good total.
But I knew Pakistan had won the game the second Shahzaib got out. He had a nightmare and anyone replacing him was going to be good news and thus with another superb innings by the unsung hero of the team Shoaib Malik, we got what we needed to see us through. Alhamdulillah.
It’s sad news to hear of Younis’s sudden retirement from T20 because I think he’s a credit to the game. He’s excellent at pacing the batting, a safe pair of hands, and brave enough to make some crazy decisions despite the possible risks and criticisms. Personally, I think Pakistan should only be captained by Khans. All formats. For ever. But I would say that, innit?
All that was left was the fun and smiles at the end – countless thanks to “the Allah” naturally – and then the good old Pak speeches etc. What about the fiqh from Fawad Alam (should that be ‘Aalim?) at the end who showed the rest of his team that facing the Qiblah is not a condition for a sajdat’l-shukr? Nice one. And was there anything more hilarious than Kamran Akmal’s face when he realised that he had to rub shoulders with the gori from the England Women’s Team at the photo call?? Absolute classic!
In conclusion – considering I see myself as a purist – the T20 format has produced another great spectacle and a wonderful tournament. From the bitterness of one of my favourite cricketeers Vettori to the magic of Gayle’s innings against Lee; there was Malinga’s slow ball full toss which is easily the most scariest ball of the tournament, forget Gul’s slow bouncer or Mendis’s magic. And what about Mathews’s quite astonishing fielding? Yet again the Sri Lankans truly amazed us this year.
The Dilshan scoop isn’t the joke it looks either. To get the scoop might be easy enough in principle, but to do it to a quick bowler off a length ball, and most importantly exactly time the drop of the head at the very last second is just sheer genuius and he well deserved Player of the Tournament.
And then of course, there was that catch. I think the word “game-changer” was probably created for that Afridi moment.
All in all, an excellent boost for the sad and suffering people of Pakistan who will gratefully accept any kind of good news to provide even a moment’s escape from their constant misery at the hands of a secular government and/or rabid extremists. No doubt though that cricket slapped the terrorists in the face today, and spat on their attempt to destroy the one ray of light that most average Pakistanis look to in the dunya those four months ago in Lahore.
Alhamdulillah, and Pakistan – Zindabad.
June 22, 2009 at 12:18 am
SubhanAllah the most lame sport I have ever witnessed despite never once watching a match.
Sammy
June 22, 2009 at 12:20 am
SubhanAllah the most lame sport I have ever seen depsite never once watching a match
S
June 22, 2009 at 2:04 am
It was awesome!
Shame we didn’t get to see Misbah get a decent know during the tournament. Hopefully he’ll get moved up the order to 4th now Younis has retired.
June 22, 2009 at 4:54 am
Fiqh of Fawad Alim! Lol! Your posts on cricket are always entertaining.
So what is the ruling on facing the Qiblah while making sajdah ash-shukr?
June 22, 2009 at 5:14 am
Hilarious!
Correct me if I’m wrong please Ustadh:
There is no requirement of facing the qiblah or wudu or khimaar (these things that would normally be required for salaah), as had all these things been required sajdatu-shukr would lose its element of being spontanious.
June 22, 2009 at 1:55 pm
Congrats AE……well deserved. I really didn’t think you guys would do it after Sangakarra’’s innings (what a cricketer….and what a captain)
Fantastic tournament….just what cricket needed. WI made it to the semis and that for me was a surprise so i can’t complain.
Nice one on Kamran’s facial expression when he realised he was at the end of the row. I thought i was the only one who spotted his look of horror when the girls squeezed in for the picture!
June 22, 2009 at 2:52 pm
SubhanAllah the most lame sport I have ever witnessed despite never once watching a match.
Sammy
Hahaha! I’ll tell you what’s “Subhanallah” – how bitter Egyptians can get when they get battered 3-0 by the Americans in football!
Actually let me tell you all a story about my beloved Sammy: clearly being an Arab did not predispose him to cricket when we were at school, but we would let him play with us (cos’ we wozn’t racialist like dat) because he could throw the ball far. Not much else I’m afraid, but at least he could throw the ball!
So as you can imagine, he’s not exactly fond of the beautiful game…!
Shame we didn’t get to see Misbah get a decent know during the tournament. Hopefully he’ll get moved up the order to 4th now Younis has retired.
Yes it is a shame that he didn’t get a chance to hit the winning runs after coming so close last time but as I like to remind everyone, a bit of bad form this time round will never blot out his heroics last time:
http://alternativeentertainment.wordpress.com/2007/11/23/in-defence-of-misbah-ul-haq/
And yes, sad as it is with the retirement of Younus, it looks as if we might get Mohammad Yousuf back after his return to the Test team which is wonderful news. Sure, he’s getting on a bit but as we’ve quickly learnt T20 is all about class and experience, and not just biff, bash and Mathews diving all over the place.
So what is the ruling on facing the Qiblah while making sajdah ash-shukr?
Well this is it – all the schools agree that it must be done towards the Qiblah, except for Ibn Taymiyyah and enough of a detractor he is! I’m with sister Talibah on this one and I think the evidence is overwhelmingly with Shaykh Fawad Alam: no conditional need for wudhu, Qiblah or even to be on the ground.
So does this mean that all the Pak team are becoming Salafis, or is it more like, “Bas chori yaara, Dil Dil Pakistan, it’s all good. Just try your level best to be good Muslim and the rest is in the heart…”
I really didn’t think you guys would do it after Sangakarra’’s innings (what a cricketer….and what a captain)
Honestly Tariq (who’s a West Indian by the way…don’t ask!) Sangakkara is a cricketer on a completely different level to his peers. Actually, peerless. And he really captained well yesterday and batted excellently, enough to make me think that we’d lost it. Incidentally, if I was him, the only thing I would have done is to not give Udana the 18th over but I guess we were on our way by then…
As for the West Indies, I just don’t know what happened to the bats of all those openers to give Mathews figures he quite blatantly didn’t deserve. Bravo, Simmons and of course Gayle played wonderful cricket – a complete different team to the last 12 months (12 years?
) being regularly humiliated by the likes of England.
But yes, an excellent tournament all round.
June 22, 2009 at 3:13 pm
Abu Eesa
What if someone does not know the direction of the Qibla when trying to make Sajda-e-Shukr, can you still make it with best guess, like you can do your Salah if you are not sure about the direction of Qibla?
Sunni Muslim
June 22, 2009 at 3:31 pm
Eish, Abu Eesa, the Pakistanis do not know what the word ‘Salafi’ means.
It’s definitely the latter.
June 22, 2009 at 4:17 pm
What if someone does not know the direction of the Qibla when trying to make Sajda-e-Shukr, can you still make it with best guess, like you can do your Salah if you are not sure about the direction of Qibla?
This is called taharree in the books of fiqh and indeed, as long as one tries his best then even with the obligatory prayer one doesn’t need to repeat the prayer if he prayed in the wrong direction (and he’s not a resident and other details found amongst the Fuqaha’).
So what then of a sajdah which itself isn’t obligatory and not from the genus of Salah anyway? So yes, you can indeed make your best guess and make the Sajdat’l-Shukr whichever direction you feel best is correct (and not just follow the crowd!) which is why I really liked Fawad’s move!
Eish, Abu Eesa, the Pakistanis do not know what the word ‘Salafi’ means.
It’s definitely the latter.
And alhamdulillah for that! Can you imagine it? Like we don’t get enough hassle from “Ahle-Hadees” as it is…
(Shudder!)
June 22, 2009 at 8:51 pm
Enough of the cricket . . .
http://www.ilmstoke.org presents:
Title: Possessed or Depressed?
Date: Sunday 12th July 2009
Start time: 13:00
Venue: North Staffordshire Conference and Seminar Centre, Hartshill Road, Stoke On Trent, ST4 7NY
Summary: A course on Jinn, Black Magic and Mental Health.
Tutors:
Ustadh Shaqur Rehman – Student of knowledge, teacher and instructor with Sabeel (www.iprogress.org.uk) and member of MRDF ( Muslim Research and Development Foundation – http://www.mrdf.co.uk )
Dr Faizal Moosa – Consultant Psychiatrist and Chairperson of the Muslim Doctors and Dentists Association (MDDA – http://www.mdda.org.uk).
Description:
Is black magic allowed in Islam? Do Jinn live amongst us? Can we see them? Is someone with Schizophrenia “possessed”? Will amulets and spells work? Surely Prozac will help?
Jinn and black magic are common in Muslim communities which account for many marriage breakdowns, splitting of families and mental disorders. Unfortunately, this area has many misconceptions which lead Muslims to even greater problems i.e. seeking help of ‘magicians’, Peers/“Saints” and amulets/taweez.
Also, genuine mental disorders are labelled as possession and legitimate medical help is not sought.
To help educate ourselves, IlmStoke is pleased to present this unique course covering:
1. A detailed and academic study off the world of the Jinn and black magic with Q&A and course folders provided
2. Medical insight by a Consultant psychiatrist educating us about mental illness in the community
For further info please go to http://www.ilmstoke.org
June 22, 2009 at 11:39 pm
Thanks Abu Eesa for answering that question.
Salams and Duas
Sunni Muslim
June 22, 2009 at 11:46 pm
Traversing Deep Waters A Discourse on Practical Unity Based on Sound Knowledge: Answers by al-Allamah Muhammad al-Hassan Walid al-Dido al-Shinqiti
Q. There are many different sects and madhāhib [Eng. Schools of Islamic law]. When we look at them it is difficult to gauge their relationship with Ahl al-Sunna. Are they close or distant? Let us begin with the Ash’aris.
A. Let us first clarify what is meant by the word madhhab [Eng. School of thought]. A madhhab is a way of engaging the texts, therefore everything that Gibr̄il [Eng. Angel Gabriel] brought from Allah does not constitute a madhhab, and every text considered definitive in Islamic law is not a madhhab. A madhhab cannot occur except in the realm of ijtihad [Eng. independent interpretation made by a qualified legal scholar].
In light of that, the Ash’aris, Maturidis and Ahl al-Hadith all constitute different madhhabs [of their own]. This is due to the fact that the definitive texts are unanimously agreed upon by these three schools whereas they differed [established their madhabs] in areas where it was acceptable.
Whoever denies a definitive text from the Qur’an or the Sunna is a disbeliever. As for other issues based on the interpretations of men, they can be both correct and incorrect. The Ash’āris were mistaken about certain issues, but those wrongs did not take them out of Ahl al-Sunna;. Similarly the Maturidīs were wrong about some issues which, like in the case of the Ash’aris did not put them outside the category of Ahl al-Sunna.
Some of the great scholars of Ahl al-Sunna like Imām al-Bayhaqī (Allah’s mercy be upon him), Imām al-Hākim (Allah’s mercy be upon him), and Imām al-Nawwawī, Allah’s mercy be upon them were from the Ash’arī school.
Q. Some say those scholars were not Ash’ari, but that they only agreed with the Ash’aris on a few issues?
A. Actually, they were indeed scholars of the Ash’ari school and for that reason the Ash’aris reference them and take them as references.
Q. How can they be considered from Ahl al-Sunna when they differ with us in 15 fundamentals principles? The first being: the mind is the source of guidance, rather than revelation?
A. How is it correct to say that the first source of guidance is the mind according to Imam Abu Hasan al-Ash’ari when he was from the scholars of hadīth, qirāt and tafsīr and he neither said nor wrote that?
Q. What about their contention that good and evil are independent of revelation?
A. They actually didn’t say that. In fact, they refuted it! What they meant by good and evil was what was blameworthy to one’s nature and repulsive to the intellect; that good and evil in the Hereafter is strictly a Shari’ matter established solely by revelation.
Q. What about the division of the Qur’an? Is it true they divided it into two parts, the uttered and the unuttered?
A. This is not a division related to the creation of the Qur’an. It is a division solely related to the description of Allah [The Most High]. This division is found among the later scholars of hadith. It is related to ijtihad and there is no definite text regarding it. Thus if a person were to die ignorant of this division, it would not harm him in the least.
Q. So what if someone wasn’t ignorant of it?
A. Even if someone knew about it, there is no harm done because this is an issue of ijtihad. In fact, a quick glance at the works of Sheikh al-Islam Ibn Tamiyyah illustrates that he held the same opinion all be it with different wording.
Q. What about the issue of declaring those who instead of exercising intellect, follow blindly, as heretics?
A. First let it be known that this is not a contention held exclusively by Imam Abu Hasan al-Ash’aris. This is a contentious issue amongst them, as well as a contentious issue amongst the Ahl al-Had̄ith. It is related by some of the scholars of hadith that Imām al-Shafi’ī had the same opinion.
Q. What about their contention that faith in the heart is sufficient, freeing one from other responsibilities?
A. They didn’t say that. This issue is related to the understanding of faith, in that does the understanding of faith enter into the realm of actions or not? This was an issue disputed by the students of the companions [Ar. al-Tabi’īn].
Q. What about their refusal to accept issues of creed found in the sunna?
A. You will not find any of their scholars denying authentic texts because every authentic Sunna becomes definite whether related to issues of creed or deeds. Anyone who denies it is disbeliever. Allah says, By your Lord, they will not believe until they make you a judge in their disputes… (Qur’an 4:65).
Q. Are these things that we read and hear attributed to the Ash’aris not authentic?”
A. Yes, most of the things attributed to them are not from authentic sources. It could be a mixing and matching of statements made by some Ash’aris [but not representative of the school]. As mentioned before, the school has many mistakes and Imam Abu Hasan al-Ash’ari made a number of mistakes. Some of them he changed and clarified in his works such as al-Maqalat al-Islamiyin and al-Ibanah. He failed to correct other mistakes and he and his followers continued to believe and act on them. Even so they remain from Ahl al-Sunna and their mistakes in creed were related to matters of ijtihad.
Q. Summarizing, then, these issues are not those that would take them out of the circle of Ahl al-Sunna?
A. No, they are not outside of Ahl al-Sunna. They do have some mistakes, but those mistakes do not take them out of the Ahl al-Sunna category. In this, they resemble schools of fiqh: the Hanafis, Malikis, Shafi’is and the Hanbalis. All of them are schools from the schools of Ahl al-Sunna. They all have their mistakes but their mistakes do not put them outside of the madhhab of Ahl al-Sunna.
Q. What do you say about the Sufis?
A. They differ according to their conditions and states. There are those who are Ahl al-Sunna in creed and practice, and they are accepted as such. Examples would be Sheikh ‘Abdul al-Qādir al-Jaylānī [Allah’s mercy upon him], al-Harawī [Allah’s mercy upon him] and other notable scholars and even Ibn al-Qayyim [Allah’s mercy be upon him] was a Sufi, and he is the sheikh of the true Sufis!
Q. Ibn al-Qayyim was a Sufi? That is hard to digest!
A. But why?! He said that about himself and wrote about it in Madārij al-Sālikīn and Udāt al-Sabirīn and other works which illustrate his tasawwuf.
The religion is based on three pillars: Faith, Islam, and Ihsān. Faith addresses the intellect, Islam addresses the body, and Ihsān addresses the spirit. As for the last pillar, there isn’t much attention given to it except from those who were concerned with spiritual progress. And these people are definitely called Sufis. Thus tasawwuf is like fiqh: there is the accepted and the rejected. It is as simple as what agrees with Islamic law is accepted and anything else is rejected.
May the peace and blessings be upon the Prophet, his family, companions and those who follow them until the end of time.
Translated and abridged by Suhaib Webb from Fiqh al-Asr, pp. 44-47.
June 23, 2009 at 5:47 am
http://www.asharis.com
June 23, 2009 at 8:14 am
[...] [...]
June 23, 2009 at 2:18 pm
http://www.rbgtube.com/play.php?vid=4841
June 24, 2009 at 7:33 am
NOT AGAIN BAN ON BURKHA OR NIQAB
ABU EESA WHAT WENT WRONG IN FRANCE?ARNT THE MUSLIMS STRONG ENOUGH THERE.SERIOUSLY MAY ALLAH CURSE quilliamfoundation FOR THERE SUCH IGNORANT STATEMENT IN THE NEWSPAPER.
THERE NO EVIDENCE FOR THE BURKHA OR NIQAB.SO WORRIED I DNT LIKE WHEN THIS KIND OF STUFF HAPPENS.AND EVEN THE NEWS AND PAPERS MAKE EVEN MORE WORSE.Y DO SUCH PPL MAKE STATEMENTS,ESPECIALLY WEN THEY SAY THERE MUSLIMS. NOT HAPPY AT ALL TOTALLY SAD NOW
June 25, 2009 at 3:07 am
Assaamu’alaykum Ustadh.
What kind of things should we be doing about this ‘Burka’ – (excuse my french) fiasco?
June 25, 2009 at 6:37 am
Assalamualaykum
Congratulations to all the pakistani fans…Though i’m an indian yet i support pakistan..ha! we are stuck in between..Pakistanis mock at us..why dont u support your own country and hindus mock us that you are treacherous to your own country..
But frankly my dear I hardly give a damn..
i least like cricket but am happy on pakistan’s victory in this time of turmoil..pakistan needed a victory and India needed a defeat!
~Cool Muslimah~
June 25, 2009 at 8:30 pm
A BURNLEY Euro-MP is calling on local Muslim women to take a lead in making clear the wearing of the burka is “not welcome.
http://www.burnleyexpress.net/burnleynews/Burka-39not-welcome-in-Burnley39.5395857.jp
Contact Chris Davies:
http://www.chrisdaviesmep.org.uk/
Constituency Office
87A Castle Street, Stockport SK3 9AR
Tel: 0161 477 7070
Fax: 0161 477 7007
E-mail: chrisdaviesmep@cix.co.uk