I was recently fortunate enough to enjoy the company of the tireless Desmond Tutu during a session on post-conflict resolution. An interesting anecdote he mentioned was his experiences with a few Muslim communities undergoing oppression or other difficulties. He noted their hospitality, constant smiling and optimism and interestingly their propensity to have a laugh and a joke at their situations despite often terrible tragedy.
Actually all Muslims will be able to relate to this. We spend an awful amount of time laughing at ourselves and our deficiencies. Sure, much of our situation is no laughing matter particularly with the loss of so much innocent life around the world but a true observation is still a true observation however bizarre it might seem.
Tutu was referring to much of the African scene in particular Sudan and Somalia. But yesterday was the turn of the NWFP Pathans.
During a large gathering of Pathans from the much troubled region of Swat and surrounding areas, we reminisced together over the last few years “back home” and it was fascinating to reflect on key stages of the fitnah as it developed with the “Taliban”.
You see, the Pathans of Pakistan are generally a very simple and straightforward people. They don’t have many needs and they are orthodox and conservative by nature. When it comes to “Allah and His Messenger said…” then they are instantly obedient. Some might get lazy with respect to application and practice but very few Pathans will try to use their ‘aql and overcome the texts as is the wont of the modernists today. This is reflected in the fact that up to now, percentage wise, the Pathans suffer minimal liberalist and modernist deviations in religion compared to their counterparts. But on the flip side, they suffer a high percentage of problems due to the other end of the scale: extremism.
Many Maulvis and Mujahideen have taken advantage of this favourable state of circumstances. For the basic Pathan, hospitality of the stranger is a must, even if he be an enemy. Much money is spent supporting Jihad, supporting the families of those widowed or orphaned in war, and for students studying Islam in the local Madaris. Clearly, this is a dream situation for those extreme deviants and terrorists amongst us, abusing the sincerity of the locals and destroying the good name of the people of Jihad and the teachers of Islam in the Masajid.
During the gathering – a mixture of British Pathans, those who have recently returned from holiday and those who have been successful in fleeing the region – we recounted how these very Taliban who were slicing the throats of locals and our family members opposed to their ideology were the very same ones who we would be sending freshly cooked naan to every evening over the last few years when the call from the Taliban was for straightforward Shari‘ah in the region – something which all the locals were generally delighted to have – and not the declaration of takfeer and the shedding of innocent blood it has turned into now.
One who has just returned from the region talked about how his life savings have been lost as his house was taken over by the Taliban. The women and children of the house were kicked out and told to find other accommodation as a Taliban commander moved in with his own family to the main section, and then had the guest quarters of the house converted into a makeshift hospital for Taliban fighters, complete with ambulances and even forcing an elderly Babu of the village to tend to the injured which he was happy to do.
Word quickly reached the army of this new location and then in typical Pakistani fashion they came and bombed the entire house out of existence killing all the occupants, the injured, the helpers, the local villagers in the surrounding houses and leaving just the burning ambulances in the courtyards.
He started laughing. “Kasmai, we complain about American missiles being off-target but you should see our boys!”
He then stopped and there was silence. A few more people give their own stories of how their houses and valuables have been destroyed either by the Taliban or the Army in the last few months. My own father chipped in: our guest quarters have been destroyed, our water tank has been broken, our windows shattered, all by the army and their gunships. As for the Taliban then they’re trying to force their way into our cellar and want us to get rid of all our onions so that they can use it as a store-room! Cue the laughter again.
One said to my father, “Hold on, while we all used to sacrifice cows and sheep for them when they’d come through the village, wasn’t it you who actually sacrificed a camel for them back then?!” Cue the laughter again. And I’m talking hysterics.
One exclaimed how his house was taken yesterday by the Taliban. “How much are you charging him in rent?” I asked. Cue laughter.
Another said, “My brother called yesterday and said that things were not good. The Taliban are going around the houses and demanding two naans per household. We gave them six of course!” Cue laughter.
Then another one piped up, “Did you hear about the five Taliban the villagers caught in Kanju township? The ones who “halal-ed” so n’ so a few weeks before? Well by Allah, they were all found, killed and hung up in the main street and their bodies have remained there because no-one wants to bury these criminals. Who do these dogs think they are?! We respected them, looked after them, supported them and they repay us by cutting our necks?! What do they think? That after all this dies down, will any one of them be left alive? That we won’t take “Badla”? We will pursue them for generations!”
Silence. Nods of agreement. Serious and stern looks on the faces of everyone there. Then, my father gives me that special look.
“So who wants tea and who wants juice then?” I asked.
Tears. Laughter. Just another day.
July 7, 2009 at 1:03 pm
i aint got a clue lol
July 7, 2009 at 3:10 pm
May Allah make it easy for all the suffering believers all over the world. Ameen.
May Allah protect all our familes from fitna. Ameen.
May Allah guide all of us to the correct Islam. Ameen.
July 7, 2009 at 3:23 pm
Ameen thumma ameen to ^^^
July 7, 2009 at 3:21 pm
Nice piece mashallah. Some all time beauties from yourself about the NWFP, huddod and cricket – from your trip to Pakland in April, ‘05.
“…Oh and isn’t it just a classic when the Paks take the camera in the awards ceremony? Top marks to the team’s religious advisers because you can just feel those billions of Hindus just physically squirm in their seats when our boys Afridi, Shoaib, Rana and Inzy get asked all the questions by Ravi Shastri and they respond:
“Bismillah al-Rahman al-Rahim. Firstly, all thanks to Almighty Allah…”
Aaaaah – you just can’t beat it when first honours go to the right Recipient. Simple and naïve this introduction might sound, but boy does it hit the spot! Especially when every Pak who comes up to pick up his prize busts the same line again and again and again to the nation of Mushrikeen who must be fuming at our pure Tawheed…”
“….Course we do.
A Beretta 38mm with an extra magazine isn’t usually the norm though. Kinda puts you off your ruku’ if you know what I’m saying.
Especially when the guy whose feet it’s at is my great uncle, touching 75 years and is half blind…”
“..And that’s coming from the arguably most ultra-religious and conservative piece of Muslim land in the East. Can you imagine what it was like in the other areas?
Being in the NWFP is a totally amazing experience. There is so much raw tradition, culture, history and honour on display, it can be quite overwhelming. The Islamic aspects of family, tribes, adab and honour really come to life in such a place. The Masjid takes on a whole other dimension to ones life. The surrounding environment, the beauty of the scenery, the simplicity of its people, the poverty of a nation, the often associated jahl of its people as well as their amazing attributes come to life and are accentuated.
It reminds me how important it is for us all to travel, for indeed it is a form of knowledge. The early salaf would consider a person’s knowledge deficient if he had not had some form of travelling experience behind him. I can see why…”
“I bring this up after all the shenanigans surrounding Hudud and mora-whatsits and God knows what else. If there was ever a place you’d have expected to have the Hudud established, it would be right here in Swat, NWFP. Honestly, you’ve never seen so many beards in your entire life. You’ve never seen as many mosques. You’ve never seen as many people for a jama’a prayer either. Yet the Hudud isn’t in force. I don’t know why but it isn’t..”
Just a question to you AE though if I may, ‘coz you know these things much better…
How do people say with high levels of surety that these lot are the ‘real’ Taliban, with all the other information coming out about some of the dead being found to have been cirrcumcised etc (purportedly implying that they may be ‘outsider’ posing as Tali’s ? Because if we can’t be sure, especially in the face of some evidence indicating otherwise – isn’t it better to hold back from generalising like that, islamically speaking?
Thanks for your time inshallah.
Wassalam alaikom
July 7, 2009 at 5:26 pm
sorry that should have been uncircumcised*
:/
July 7, 2009 at 3:57 pm
Assalaam o alykum,
A teacher at the Haram Ka’ba and Professor in Umm Al-Qurra University the Noble Shaykh, Shaykh WaseeUllah Abbas hafidhUllah said about Al-Ikhlaas School in Nelson, England:
“….From the signs of goodness is that our sincere brothers amongst those who we are acquainted with in Keighley – Shahpal and Taj – and those who assist them have established a number of schools to cultivate and educate the children of the Muslims (Al-Ikhlaas Education Complex) [comprising of] Tawheed Secondary School for Girls and Al-Ikhlaas Primary School.
We therefore request the Muslims and encourage them to support the brothers in strengthening and developing their schools by donating towards them and thereafter enrolling their children [in these schools] to learn the pure Deen and the correct belief.
May Allah assist them towards all goodness.
Written: Waseeullah ibn Muhammad Abbaas
Teacher: Masjid al-Haraam
Lecturer: University Umm al-Qurra
Makkah al-Mukkaramah”
Our dear brothers and sisters: As-salaamu ‘alay-kum wa rahmatullah!
In light of the current condition of the Muslim youth, our objective is to encourage the children to adhere to their religion in a proud and dignified manner, in addition to raising their attainment in secular subjects. thereby resulting in the revival of an exemplary Islamic education standard. In order to achieve this we are committing ourselves to establishing Islamic schools at primary and secondary level.
We are making an urgent appeal for donations towards the establishment of the FIRST Islamic Nursery and Primary School in Nelson, Lancashire. Alhamdulillah, a new building has been purchased (Norfolk Street, Nelson), but we require £65,000 to help complete the final stage of renovation and acquiring school equipment.
Our appeal is urgent as the school is scheduled to open by mid August. IF WE ARE UNABLE TO RAISE £65,000 WITHIN THE NEXT 2 WEEKS, THE SCHOOL WILL NOT OPEN.
If only 6500 people can donate £10 each, we will have attained our target. This noble aim can potentially be achieved within a week!
Only 325 volunteers need to find 20 donators to give £10 each and we will have easily reached our aim!
All it takes is a few mouse clicks to spread awareness of this appeal!
Here is a breakdown of the costs involved:
Item. Room.. Price
Aqua Boards Toilets £500.00
Boiler x2 Store Room .£4,000.00
Cement and Skim Miscellaneous £300.00
Disabled Toilets Toilets £600.00
Flooring First Floor £7,400.00
Flooring Ground Floor £5,500.00
FlooringStaff Room – Male. £300.00
FlooringReception £250.00
Disable LiftMain Hall/Office £1,500.00
LightingGround Corridor £150.00
Suspended CeilingsGround Floor .£600.00
Resources Internal £15,000.00
Ground Work External £15,000.00
CCTV.Internal/External £3,000.00
ElectriciansLabour £5,500.00
WorkersLabour £5,000.00
Total: £64,600.00
Continuous reward – even after your death
Our Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him said: “When the son of Adam dies, all of his actions cease except for three: a continuous charity, a child who supplicates for his parents, and beneficial knowledge.” [Sahih Muslim]
The love of Allah
“Those who spend [in Allah's Cause] in prosperity and in adversity, who repress anger, and who pardon men; verily, Allah loves Al-Muhsinun (the good-doers.” [Al-Quran 3:134]
Blessings and an increase in your wealth
“Who is it that will lend to Allah a goodly loan, so that He may multiply it for him many times…” [Al-Quran 2:245]
Forgiveness
“Sadaqah extinguishes sins as water extinguishes fire.” [Tirimidhi]
DO NOT MISS OUT on this opportunity to acquire all this in return! You can help us by donating from the wealth which Allah has provided for you and which he will question you about.
Bank details and online donation is available at:
http://www.fountainsofknowledge.com/primary/donate.html
For futher information about the school you can contact:
Address: Al-Ikhlaas Education Complex
Netherfield Road,
Nelson,
Lancashire,
BB9 9QS
Tel/Fax: 01282 614610
Website: http://www.al-ikhlaas.org
Email: info@al-ikhlaas.org
GIVE WHAT YOU CAN, EVEN IF IT’S £1…. SPREAD THE WORD!
Please Note: Fountains of Knowledge is a U.K. registered charity, Number 1096607.
July 7, 2009 at 8:26 pm
Assalamo alaikum.
Sorry but the original link to donate in the above post was wrong.
In order to donate we have to go to:
http://www.al-ikhlaas.org and click on ‘Donate’ in the bottom left of the screen…
Sorry about that everybody.
Allah says in the Quran:
”And the male and female believers are helpers and guardians of one another.”
And Allah says:
” And do good, for Allah loves the doers of good.”
And Allah said in a hadith qudsi:
‘Oh son of Adam, spend and Allah will spend on you.’
The prophet sallahu alaihi wa sallam said:
‘Charity does not decrease a persons wealth.’
And in another Hadith:
‘Whoever removes a calamity from a muslim from the calamities of this world, Allah will remove a calamity from him on the day of judgement’
and in another hadith:
‘Guard yourself from the fire even with a piece of a date..’
May Allah reward everyone.
July 7, 2009 at 9:07 pm
salaam ustadh inshaAllah ur well, how many rakat did the Prophet (pbuh) pray for Isha, 9 or 17? Please clarify as i have searched alot of places but cannot find an answer, i wish to follow His (pbuh) sunnah and im really really confused.
Jazakallahu khayrun.
July 8, 2009 at 12:44 pm
salam ustadh
i have afew questions please could you answer them i would appreciate it, they might lame but please do answer.i have no 1 else to ask.
q1; is there a hadith regarding the army of imam mehdi coming from khorasan? if yes which part is included in it,does it include Afghanistan,swat Peshawar, Uzbekistan.could u give the wisdom behind that hadith a brief or detail meaning of it.
q2; i want to what is the belief of aswj sunnis regarding the messenger pbuh in his grave a live or dead. i have different says please could use all the hadith from both sides and answer.jzk
q3; also an other aqeedah question does ALLAH have a direction can we point in the sky? or there is no direction where He is present?
q4; regarding qasidah burdah is ok to recite in full? some say it is haram and that it elevates the status of our beloved pbuh over ALLAH? and is it true that the saudi’s removed the burdah from the holy masjid in madina just leaving a couple of verses?
please do answer
jzk
July 8, 2009 at 12:49 pm
sorry i have 1 more question forgive me 4 asking
are the parents of our beloved pbuh muslims or non muslims again read & heard different things
again my sincere apologies for asking to many questions
as ALLAH says if you do not know as the learned ones. i regard you a learn one
dnt get big headed jokeee
July 8, 2009 at 2:20 pm
Ustādh AE shared some of his thoughts on the topic here:
http://alternativeentertainment.wordpress.com/2008/03/25/is-it-permissible-to-attend-a-non-muslim-funeral/#comment-6296
July 9, 2009 at 5:10 am
most definitely my own personal opinion on this issue is that which is narrated from some of the earlier ‘Ulema (as mentioned in ‘Awn’l-Ma‘bood) that to just quote the narration in its chapter and not say any more is better, safer and more respectful.
i agree with that better to be safe then sorry.please ustadh please answer my 1st four questions will be very helpful.mashALLAH u are so balanced i really like.i sincerly love u for the sake of ALLAH
July 8, 2009 at 3:16 pm
QUESTION: I know a brother who is umming and ahhing about growing a beard but hes heard a few things that are freaking him out: i) If you grow a beard with intention of Sunnah and then shave the sin is equivelent to commiting murder ii) If you have a beard for more than 40 days you are forbidden to shave (lets ignore for a minute you may be sinful anyway for shaving but whats implied here is even more so). Are any of these things true?
July 8, 2009 at 3:19 pm
Arabic lessons starting at Medina Mosque, 2 Barlow Road, Levenshulme, Manchester
Fridays at 6pm
July 8, 2009 at 10:50 pm
is it for men or women, who’s teaching and how much £ ?
July 12, 2009 at 3:25 pm
for brothers and its free!
July 8, 2009 at 3:21 pm
http://www.ilmstoke.org
July 8, 2009 at 4:31 pm
JazakumAllah khair for sharing these personal accounts. It is amazing how we can laugh at times of misery, but perhaps that is a survival mechanism, and thus a mercy from Allah? Allahu ‘alam.
July 8, 2009 at 10:23 pm
Please post this on MM. They are censoring me:
@ Iesa
Assalamu ‘alaikum wa rahmatullahi wa barakaatuh,
Again, thank you for responding to my comments about your article. In the future though, can you make the feedback process a little bit smoother; I felt like it was a challenge simply getting my views up on this site and getting constructive criticism back.
Also, do you mind putting up my whole comment. The other half, and I think it contains most of my significant points, is still awaiting moderation.
That said I would like to respond to some of the issues you raised in your response and clarify some of the initial issues.
Here goes:
With regards to the argument you keep repeating about the article not being about you or the views not being yours, I agree that that is indeed the case. The argument I am making is a broader one, that doesn’t necessarily have a lot do with you personally, which is that as a media outlet the viewpoints and opinions that you consistently give way to, without challenge, are your opinions and arguments by default. I think that’s a generally established fact in the world of media studies. So for you to cry “these are not my arguments” is a bit puzzling.
As far as my post being characterized as one of “attacking”, I would ask what about my post is particularly hostile? I make neither insults nor threaten anybody in my post and I maintain throughout it logical and straightforward arguments. I don’t feel anything in my comment is unfair or out of place, as far as manners of argument go. When does a comment become out of line? When it challenges your view-points, all of a sudden I am “attacking” you? If you can point out where I stepped out of bounds in my manners of debate, I would love to know so I could rectify that in the future, insha’allah.
As far of your charge that I am “assuming knowledge of” your “beliefs” and peering into your heart to look at the ghayb (Unseen), I think that is a grave charge and it offends me. Like I explained, the views and opinions you consistently present as a media body, without allowing for the other side to at least rebut, are representative of the biases of your reporting. Otherwise, why would you give me such a hassle in countering Mr. Galloway’s arguments? Also, aside from simple journalistic integrity, lets not lose sight of the fact that you have an obligation, as a Muslim media organisation, to be Islamically responsible in your reporting. As a matter of principle I don’t think it was Islamically responsible for you to air the views of a disbeliever who is far, far away from the Islamic methodology without at least a disclaimer. Just so I am clear, what I am referring to when I say Islamically irresponsible are the following points I mentioned in my previous comment:
“By the consistent promotion of non-believers like Galloway as “the authority” on this issue you establish the basis upon which this issue will be approached… and I think you realize this. That means the issue of our holy mosque and holy land is presented as an issue of:
-Secular nationalism
-Civil rights
-Human rights
-Self-determination
-Political activism
I think its fair to say that to the bulk of the 1 billion Muslims on this earth, when you bring up this issue these are not the words that immediately come to mind.”
If you are bothered by the claim that you are promoting “secular nationalism”, then let me hear a clear statement that you do not support a secular nationalistic state of “Palestine” (otherwise that’s the idea readers would get) and instead support the Islamic principle that the government legislated by Allah (SWT) in His Book and on the tongue of His Messenger (SAW) is the government that takes as its constitution the Qur’an and the Sunnah and is a Muslim state that in all its laws and customs abides by the commands of Allah (SWT).
About your counter-counterpoint #1)
Yes, I mentioned Salahudeen and I, in fact, don’t hold him only to his success in “liberating Palestine” but what I intended in mentioning him is to establish some points. When I ask you these questions, they are heart to heart, muslim to muslim, and I ask you them in the spirit of brotherhood and the search for truth and following it, so please take me seriously and don’t respond with ridicule and arrogance:
By Al-’Asr (the time). Verily! Man is in loss, Except those who believe and do righteous good deeds, and recommend one another to the truth, and recommend one another to patience. (1-3. 103)
What do we mean when we say Salahudeen “liberated” Palestine? Don’t we mean that he routed the Crusader army at Hittin, marched to Al-Quds, abolished the Crusader “Kingdom of Jerusalem”, and the government and authority in Al-Quds returned to the Muslims under the “Ayyubid dynasty of Saladin”? If you accept that reading of events, then a perfectly synonymous turn of events today would go something like this:
“X routed the Zionist army at X, marched to Al-Quds, abolished the Zionist “State of Israel”, and the government and authority in Al-Quds returned to the Muslims under the “X dynasty of X”.
Now if you lay claim to Salahudeen and agree with what he did, would you have the same thing happen today, with brave men following in the footsteps of his legendary example?
As for the next point, yes it is true that today Salahudeen is universally regarded as a just figure who waged a just war and conducted himself with justice. But let me ask you, do you think that was the perception of Salahudeen in Europe back then? Clearly, the answer is no. In fact, ever since the third, of 9, crusades, Christian Europe fought to recapture Al-Quds from Salahudeen, long after his death. That is all to say, that if we expect that someone will raise the banner of Jihad to liberate Al-Quds today and not be called a “terrorist”…then we are sorely misguided. As for the issues of treatises and contracts of peace, then if you are drawing a constrast between Salahudeen and the contemporary Mujahidin, then I would just like to clarify that the Mujahidin like Salahudeen before them have consistently offered peace and treaties to the Yahood and her supporters, chiefly America, as recently as June 2, when Mustafa Abu al-Yazid, the leader of al Qaeda’s operation in Afghanistan, said in an interview with Al Jazeera television what is summarized below:
“Abu Al-Yazid set out five conditions: “to withdraw from Muslim countries, stop supporting the occupant (Israel) in Palestine, end the support of apostate governments and usurpers of power in Muslim countries, stop any aggression against the Muslims and release all Muslim prisoners in US prisons.”
“In this case, there will be a truce between us of, for example, ten years,” said Abu Al-Yazid.
“We will invite them to convert to Islam. If they refuse to convert, we will impose Jiziah on them (a tax paid by non-Muslims who live under the rule of a Muslim government). If they refuse, there will be war,” warned the number three of the terrorist network (after Osama bin Laden and Ayman Al-Zawahiri).
“But we believe they will refuse. Therefore, the Nation of Islam is called to prepare for jihad.”"
http://www.middle-east-online.com/English/?id=32906
But if people expect peace and treaties when the above-mentioned conditions are not met, then that is not called a peace treaty, that is called surrender.
Yes, I also believe that the Shari’a provides us with many tools to stand against oppression and I also believe that we should use all of them, including military force or, as it is called in Islam, Jihad. Do you also agree that we should use all of our tools including military force, or that we should use all of our tools except military force? If it is the latter, then how do you expect to liberate Palestine? “Please, Mr. Netanyahu, I hope you can recognize the legitimacy of my claims to this land and how you have illegally settled our land and our homes after driving us out of them through demolitions and genocide. I put my faith in your kindness and integrity, that you will simply return this land to us and to our authority just on the basis that it is the right thing to do.”?
Also with regards to your statement:
“Furthermore, with no Amir of the Believers, no Islamic state, no unity among the Ummah, the authoritative representation of a unified Muslim position – let alone, just military action – is not pragmatic.”
In fact, not only do we have an Amir of the Believers, we actually have 2:
Amir al-Mu’minin Mulla Muhammad Omar, Amir of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan
Amir al-Mu’minin Abu Omar al-Qurashi al-Baghdadi, Amir of the Islamic State of Iraq
Preferably we should only have one Amir as the Prophet (SAW) taught us, but these leaders don’t claim to be the Khalifa and call their states Caliphates but instead an Imaara’ and Dawla respectively, so they exercise control over their respective regions (as was the case many times in Islamic history). And Insha’allah when Allah defeats the enemy and establishes us on the earth, one of these men will assume the role of Khalif over an Islamic Caliphate…the one the Prophet (SAW) prophecised was to come at the end of times: “khilaafa ‘alaa minhaj an-nubawaa – a Caliphate upon the prophetic methodology. So why don’t you recognise these men? Are you waiting for the U.N., the U.S, and Europe to “recognize” them, change their maps, and send a delegation from the United Nations to Kandahar to assume diplomatic ties with the Ameer? If that is what people are waiting for, then they have never read a page of Islamic history. These men will be recognized when the West can no longer pretend they don’t exist. Now, obviously, these men and their soldiers are currently in a full-scale war with the most advanced military power the world has ever known, and that’s what the fight over there is about, and once they achieve victory, Insha’allah, the issue will become even clearer.
And of course, we have 2 Islamic States as I mentioned, the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan and the Islamic State of Iraq, and we have a Wilaayah (Province) in Somali as declared by the Mujahideen there, and in time they will come under the authority of the state that emerges under the current circumstances in Iraq and Afghanistan.
And of course we have unity among the Ummah and we do indeed have an “authoritative representation of a unified Muslim position” however much it can still be built upon and improved. We all agree:
-We want to liberate our lands that are under enemy occupation
-We want to spread the message of Islam, through the sword and the pen
-We want Shari’a and not Secular law
-We want our enemies to stop massacring us
-We want our enemies to stop exploiting our natural resources
-We want safety, security, and opportunity in our lands
-We want to defend ourselves against anyone who threatens us
So who disagrees with that? Are you waiting for there to exist no Munaafiqeen and traitors in the Ummah…that will never happen because were it to happen it would have happened in the Prophet (SAW)’s time, when we know there was a whole movement of Nifaq, headed by Ubay’ Ibn Salul, so how much more in our time which the prophet described in the Hadith:
“Just before the Anti-Christ there will be years of great deception in which people will disbelieve one who tells the truth and believe the liar. They will distrust one who is trustworthy and trust one who is treacherous. And the ruwaybida will speak.” They asked: “What is the ruwaybida?” He said: “The minor scoundrel (al-fuwaysiq) who will have his say in general affairs.” Narrated from Anas by Ahmad
So your statement is out of line with reality when in fact we do have the sort of centralized authority figures who are capable of leading this ummah that you pretend we don’t. We also know that the defeatist paradigm that that comment comes from is wrong. The one that says we are not able to confront our enemies militarily, we are too weak, “oh, what would we do if America left the region!”, and so on. The ummah is more than capable of confronting and defeating its enemies in battle and to prove that just consider the fact that after 9/11 the Mujahidin have faced the full force of America’s might head on and where does the battle stand now? The answer is obvious. Also consider that that force of the Mujahidin is what compared to the full resources, manpower, strength, wealth, and collective will of the ummah? 0.0001%, 1%, 2%, maybe 3%? So how about if 10% of the ummah engaged in this struggle or 20%?
I think it’s so ironic that you state the following: “Understand, by the meaning of the word deen (religion) which for us should equate to the complete way in which we live our lives, means we should not separate or reserve Islamic guidance for specific issues or parts of our lives. Rather, we should try to please Allah with all of our actions. ” If you don’t see the irony in your statement, I simply challenge you to go back to the Aaayaat and Ahaadith of Jihad and evaluate the place Allah reserved for it in the life of a Muslim and compare that to its place in the life you advocate for the ummah here on MM.
As for your saying: “My position that Islam allows for much more variety of action than you seem comfortable with.” My position is that when Allah (SWT) unequivically orders us with a command I am not comfortable disobeying Him (SWT):
O ye who believe! what is the matter with you, that, when ye are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah, ye cling heavily to the earth? Do ye prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life, as compared with the Hereafter. Unless ye go forth, He will punish you with a grievous penalty, and put others in your place; but Him ye would not harm in the least. For Allah hath power over all things. (38, 39. 9)
Do you think there is “variety of action” here?
About your counter-counterpoint #2)
Yes, absolutely I am calling for taking back Andalus. What, you’re not? Isn’t the Hukm (ruling) clear? We are obligated to re-conquer that land, and the non-muslims there will be forced to pay jizya. Do you have another Hukm? My impression was that in Islam, we follow the Ahkaam (rulings); we follow the Qur’an and Sunnah. What is your impression of Islam?
As for your statement: “In my understanding, there is no single type of governmental system enshrined in the Shari’a, however the Shari’a does give us the principles (moral guidance) from which a system of government can be administered correctly.”
So in your understanding, there is a single type of system enshrined in the Shari’a for washing oneself, performing prayer, responding to the call of nature, having sexual relations with ones spouse, dealing with neighbors, slaughtering animals for food, and so on and so forth but when it comes to the all-important, all-encompassing, absolutely critical issue of who will exercise authority on God’s earth we simply have “moral guidance” from which “a system of government”, I take that to mean any, can manage? Think about that again for a second…do you think that is logical?
And what of this thing we call the sunnah? Aren’t we suppose to follow all the guidance of the Prophet (SAW)? Yes, but except for all the functions of statehood, government, and politics?
The form of government that Islam mandates is the governments of Rasullullah (SAW), Umar bin Al-Khattab (R), Umar bin Abdul-Aziz (rah), Al-Mu’tasim (rah), Harun Ar-Rashid (rah), Salahudeen Al-Ayyubi (rah), and so on up until the present with Mullah Muhammad Omar (hfdh). Were talking about the Rashidun, Ummayun, ‘Abbasiyun, Mamaalik, Ayuubiyun, Uthmaniyun, and Insha’allah the “At-talibaniyun”:
“Prophethood will remain among you as long as Allah wills. Then Caliphate (Khilafah) on the lines of Prophethood shall commence, and remain as long as Allah wills. Then corrupt/erosive monarchy would take place, and it will remain as long as Allah wills. After that, despotic kingship would emerge, and it will remain as long as Allah wills. Then, the Caliphate (Khilafah) shall come once again based on the precept of Prophethood.“” Ahmad.
“It has been reported on the authority of Nafi, that ‘Abdullah b. Umar paid a visit to Abdullah b. Muti’ in the days (when atrocities were perpetrated on the People Of Medina) at Harra in the time of Yazid b. Mu’awiya. Ibn Muti’ said: Place a pillow for Abu ‘Abd al-Rahman (family name of ‘Abdullah b. ‘Umar). But the latter said: I have not come to sit with you. I have come to you to tell you a tradition I heard from the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him). I heard him say: One who withdraws his band from obedience (to the Amir) will find no argument (in his defence) when he stands before Allah on the Day of Judgment, and one who dies without having bound himself by an oath of allegiance (to an Amir) will die the death of one belonging to the days of Jahillyya. ” Sahih Muslim.
And the statements of the scholars:
Al-Qurtubi said in his Tafsir[29] of the verse, “Indeed, man is made upon this earth a Caliph”[30] that:
This Ayah is a source in the selection of an Imaam, and a Khaleef, he is listened to and he is obeyed, for the word is united through him, and the Ahkam (laws) of the Caliph are implemented through him, and there is no difference regarding the obligation of that between the Ummah, nor between the Imams except what is narrated about al-Asam, the Mu’tazzili …
Al-Qurtubi also said:
The Khilafah is the pillar upon which other pillars rest
An-Nawawi said[31]:
(The scholars) consented that it is an obligation upon the Muslims to select a Khalif
Al-Ghazali when writing of the potential consequences of losing the Caliphate said[32]:
The judges will be suspeneded, the Wilayaat (provinces) will be nullified, … the decrees of those in authority will not be executed and all the people will be on the verge of Haraam
Ibn Taymiyyah said[33]:
It is obligatory to know that the office in charge of commanding over the people (ie: the post of the Khaleefah) is one of the greatest obligations of the Deen. In fact, there is no establishment of the Deen except by it….this is the opinion of the salaf, such as al-Fadl ibn ‘Iyaad, Ahmad ibn Hanbal and others.
Anyways, this comment is getting too long. Please try and respond to some of the most important points.
May Allah guide me and you the straight path. Ameen.
July 9, 2009 at 1:35 am
We Muslims don’t believe in free speech though. So it’s ok for them to censor you, no?
July 8, 2009 at 10:52 pm
Wow! You met Archbishop Desmond Tutu!! SubhanAllaah!
Flannels, red balls and tea: You can’t beat it.
The Ashes are back.
July 9, 2009 at 9:31 am
The Communication Between Men & Women Over the Internet
Compiled by
Abu Ziead al-Athary
Assalamu alaykum wa Rahmatullaahi wa Barakatuhu
The noble Shaykh Ubayd al-Jabari – may Allaah protect him- repeats his warning against communication, with mobile phones or over the internet, between men and women while claiming the justification of seeking knowledge or giving Dawa’.
In an open question and answer session taking place every Sunday evening in the Paltalk room ‘Salafi Duroos’, the noble Shaykh said: ‘Communicating over the telephone is an area and way in which the heart of both the speaker and communicator will become attached to the other’s!’
Here is a transcript of what the Shaykh commented on after an answer to a similar question:
‘I would like to bring to attention a dangerous issue…. Which many of the Muslim men and women who they ascribe themselves to knowledge fall into. I have dealt with this issue before but many of the people have refused it and that they have been obstinate and rejected the advice!!
From the news that has reached me of the danger of this issue, a person finds it embarrassing to mention it…. And this is the issue, which is individuals speaking over the phone and communicating via mobile phones.
This matter has overcome many men and women with the justification of Dawa’ but this justification is not valid and it is an excuse which is corrupt. It is not hidden from every Muslim man and woman whose heart has been filled with the awe and reverential fear of Allaah, that al-Khallwaa (being alone with a member of the opposite sex with whom there is no relation) is Haraam. The meaning here is that khallwaa is being alone with strange men and women.
As for the evil effects of this, as have been relayed to me, they are more severe than al-Khallwaa (being alone with a member of the opposite sex with whom there is no relation), since al-Khallwaa in a house or in a car causes the people to look at them, as for communicating over the internet and sending and receiving messages over the phone then this is a hidden Khallwaa, which is only known to the Originator of the heavens and the earth and the noble scribes (Angels).
Indeed many women have complained that what has busied their husbands are these conversations and communication and I will mention some of their evil effects for you:
Firstly: if these communications are taking place in a chat room, for example in ‘Salafi Duroos’ so I say in the name of those supervising ‘Salafi Duroos’ ‘this type of chatting is a sin upon you… this type of chatting is a sin upon you … I do not hold it to be permissible’ I say this because I supervise ‘Salafi Duroos’ so I speak with the ruling of a representative.
Secondly: Chatting like this busies one from learning knowledge, since those who isolate themselves by conversing with whatever they want from conversation, then they busy themselves away from what is transmitted by ‘Salafi Duroos’ and from other knowledge-based lessons and this is obstruction in the path of Allaah.
Thirdly: Communicating over the telephone is an area and way in which the heart of both the speaker and communicator will become attached to the other’s! And this is – I swear by Allaah – the path of Fitnah and an entrance for Shaytaan. It is not permissible for you, O dear Muslim sister, that you spend your time conversing with strangers with the justification of Dawa’. If you have the pressing need to ask a question then ask the people of knowledge to the extent of your need and then turn away.
Further, this communication has in it greetings and gentle speech which is a type of submissive speech which has been prohibited, O Muslim sister. As a result, perhaps you might be a cause of what creeps in between married couples of unrest, quarrels and bad relations between them, the result of which could perhaps be divorce.
I have come to know that in the West and perhaps also in the East, that which is hated has occurred due to this communication and conversing.
This is why I call every Salafi man and woman to leave this terrible action which Shaytaan has opened up to them and beautified in their hearts, using the justification of knowledge and spreading of knowledge and Dawa’. It was not from the practice of the Salaf that men and women would meet up to study together, but rather a woman would ask a scholar about what a woman needs in her Deen. Also, if a female scholar was found then she would sit and listen to the men and women who came to her and would speak to the men in the presence of her guardian from behind a screen.
This is what I wanted to bring to (your) attention and Allaah knows I did not intend anything but advice and I hold that this advice to you is an obligation upon us, O dear Muslims. Allaah is The One Who guides to the correct way.’
We say JazakAllaahu Khairan O our Shaykh for this fine advice and we ask Allaah -Subhana wa Ta’ala- that He grants us and all our brothers and sisters the ability to follow the advice of the Shaykh, which he always repeats in his gatherings.
We also advise the brothers and sisters that when the lessons begin, whether they are live or recorded, that they should not busy themselves with talking on the side. We – and all praise belongs to Allaah – sacrifice time, effort and wealth for these lessons, to transmit them to you while you are in your homes or offices, so then it saddens us to know that some people attend with their nicknames only, while they are busy chatting on the side – which has no benefit – and Allaah’s aid is sought.
We ask Allaah -Subhana wa Ta’ala – that He grants us awe and reverential fear of Him in secret and in open and that He grants us sincerity in all our actions, Allaah is The Guide to the correct way.
Your Brother
Abu Ziead al-Athary
July 9, 2009 at 12:07 pm
didnt aisha may ALLAH b pleased with her gave islamic education behind a curtain to men?
July 9, 2009 at 6:35 am
[...] [...]
July 9, 2009 at 12:05 pm
http://www.enlightenyourheart.co.cc/
can all brothers and sisters comment on this.does it look tacky so on so forth its still incomplete the only tag that works is the prophets in that only a few work.please chk give ur honest reply.coz i dnt want to procede on unless i get good feed back if not then no. jazakallah
July 9, 2009 at 1:14 pm
needs a bit of colour I think
who are you aiming it at ?? non muslims or muslims?
July 12, 2009 at 4:36 pm
you could replace it with a pic of a masjid..so many beautiful ones to choose from..
July 9, 2009 at 2:11 pm
You could start by removing that picture of the girl.
This would be better for you inshAllah.
July 12, 2009 at 3:28 pm
yeah. get rid of the pictuire of the girl. Not sure what to replace it with though. best to keep it simple not too busy
July 9, 2009 at 3:42 pm
Shajarah Tayyibah Presents:
get BEHIND the veil! :
A one-day conference dealing with the
‘controversy’ around Muslim women’s dress
WOMEN ONLY!
SATURDAY 1ST AUGUST 2009
SKEELE LECTURE THEATRE, THE PEOPLE’S PALACE,
QMW UNIVERSITY,
MILE END, E1 4NS
11AM-5PM
Guests:
SHAYKH SALIM AL-AMRY
FATIMAH BARAKATULLAH
YVONNE RIDLEY
Topics:
*Hijab through the ages
*A Garment of paradise
*The media cover-up
Entrance: Only £2!
Stalls available
Call: 07735336487
Email:info@shajarahtayyibah.com
http://www.shajarahtayyibah.com
Dawah for women by women
July 11, 2009 at 11:05 am
has every 4got abt china our brethen are suffering so much no1 has spoken out
have to say our kung fu bros make some amazing mosques chk wiki.ka pow
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/khtml/2006/02/19/weekinreview/20060219_yardley_feature.html
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia-pacific/2009/07/20097111535878701.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_China
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/3656180.stm
http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2009/07/10/muslim-nations-told-help-uighurs.html
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia-pacific/2009/07/20097725217198672.html
http://english.aljazeera.net/focus/2009/07/2009710201758748116.html
July 11, 2009 at 5:42 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oX6wfmA0WCU&feature=related
EVERY MUSLIM SHOULD WATCH THIS!
July 11, 2009 at 6:07 pm
it is beyond belief that someone could be stabbed 18 times before finally being overcome when several witnesses are present..may Allah grant her the highest place in jannah
also how can we get this story in the mainstream media?Recently two brits made headline news for passing racist material about jews yet nothing for racist killings…..clearly muslim blood remains cheap for these people…..
July 12, 2009 at 12:40 pm
Salaam,
http://www.newstatesman.com/2009/07/muslim-terrorism-white-british
The stats and the lack of media coverage of “white” terrorists are shocking!!
It just goes to show how acceptable it has become in the media to blame all the worlds ills on Muslims.
July 13, 2009 at 3:46 am
Why should it surprise you it’s been clear since as long as I can remember that the goal of the media was specific in its attacking and promoting terrorism as a exclusively a Muslim domain and agenda. it’s in the psyche of most westerners by default, the shear packaging of the so called war on terror was so deliberate and to the point to cause exactly this negative image of Muslims’ the court case were our sister was so clearly stabbed and violated so publicly shows an proves to me that people are programmed to assume the worst of us.
The first person to be almost killed after her was who? Her husband why because the court room usher guard saw he was a terrorist by default, that had he been European or anything other than a person of color he would have been the hero of the hour looking after his wife and providing her with security a very praise worthy thing’ had she been like a ordinary women or just a plane Jane or her attacker been a Muslim male she would have been certainly the victim of “a terror attack” because she was wearing a hijab she is played as the provocateur and not the victim according to the European standard of reporting it was as though it was her own fault for bringing it on herself!
It’s level of violence that will be played down because of the prevailing institutionalized racism it is a characteristic of Eurocentric peoples because logic dictates it’s no big deal! We are killing them after all out in Afghanistan and Palestine and were ever else we find our blue helmets and NATO forces we are but instruments of the new colonialism (the war on terror).
It is being fought to preserve our western morals standards and freedoms? From being violated by our enemies of (democracy) here meaning specifically terrorist Muslims (and also those who may think like them) or at least that’s the media spin and the official governmental spiel.
More often than not we will all fall headlong into helping projecting these myths to enforce the public persona of Islam by doing the expected withdrawing from the fight or being silent and helping them to help us carry the burden of guilt for our shame at why we cannot change the world that hates on us, because often you only have to look at the parties of Muslims to see how they secularize and polarize to enforce most peoples racism by becoming racist themselves they feel empowered to do so by whatever the situation bears down on them. the people who spear head such ideas then perpetrate the ignorance of their crime onto the wrong people which then goes on to polarize people even more. its proverbial the more victimization they have on their backs the more foolish they become.
Only a person of knowledge could keep to a path of balance and I feel it’s the job of all Muslims to meet the dragon head on with the armor of faith since evil touches all the children of Adam in all things then only one who is upon guidance could negate such foolishness I remember once a man asked a sheikh’ “they are raping our women is it right then that we should rape theirs? He said you are a Muslim! How could you even think to do such things, then I am to assume from his answer that this is the whole spectrum of our lives we are Muslims!. We do right in all things even when we have been wronged the world is full of injustice but we must suffice to do what is right. The prophet peace and blessings of Allah be upon him said righteousness is here and he pointed to his chest and sin is what causes it to waver or what you would be afraid from the people to know.
July 13, 2009 at 4:40 am
Inshallah may Allah forgive us and except the sacrifice our sister as a witness to her iman may Allah forgive us Muslims and give us the ability to seek Allah’s forgiveness wisdom and guidance to facilitate our life in the dunya that we may be an aid to the dawah and the calling to the truth despite the present state of the Ummaah because Islam maybe a growing religion but so is the ignorance that covers the eyes and the hearts as well.
July 13, 2009 at 8:03 am
last to vids.amazing strength.
July 13, 2009 at 3:03 pm
Shaykh Ibn Jibrīn has passed away:
http://ibn-jebreen.com/
Innā lillāhi wa innā ilayhi rāji’ūn…
May Allāh subhānahu wa ta’ālā have mercy upon him.